Remember that Skyler is the one who got Walter into this mess. He heard the words “terminal cancer” from the doctor and was ready to mail it in. No financially-crippling surgeries. No painful chemotherapy. Walter was ready to die instead of gearing up for a long battle he might not win, but one that would definitely jeopardize his family’s financial future. Convinced mainly by Skyler to fight it, Walter started making meth out of practical necessity.
As I mentioned in my review of Breaking Bad, many critics have the awful habit of engaging in haughty moralizations of works of fiction instead of examining them on more aesthetic grounds. A few of the reviews I had the displeasure of reading explicitly blame Walter for the plane crash because he let Jane die, and her death caused her father to screw up in the air traffic control room, which caused to planes to collide in midair. As such, according to one hack, “This is on Walt’s head, every last bit of it, and so it feels right for fiery judgment to be rained down on that head,” in a reference to the hitherto mysterious pink teddy bear in his pool. What a stupidly simplistic view.
It is easy for these amateur ethicists isolate and blame Walter because of the obvious connection that can be made. But why not single out Sklyer for pleading with Walter to fight his cancer? Had he ignored her entreaties, Jane would likely still be alive. Or why not blame Jesse for spilling the beans to Jane about the whole operation? That made her a potential threat to Walter, and given the chance to save her life, he declined on pragmatic grounds.
The critics blame Walter because they are lazy. They see that the show revolves around him, and therefore his entire fictional world must also. But Walter is one man, even if he is the man in the show. To single him out as the primary author of such unforeseen catastrophes is to elevate him to a level of importance that no mortal could reasonably lay claim to. From its pilot episode up until last night, Breaking Bad has been one long chain of causes and events brought on by the capriciousness of fate. The crank critics can engage in their childish game of “what if” in their anemic attempts to sound deep or profound, but their moral indignation only prevents from seeing, with total clarity, that what happened could not have happened any other way.
-Max
I liked your view on the show that the protagonist rarely had a choice or better said, made the pracmatic, understandable decisions. The entire series revolves around a chain of events, where one thing leads to another. What I resent however is, that instead of talking about the show you start ranting about other critics. A mention of this is surely called for, but instead of reviewing this episode and the show in genereal you end up critising other critiques.
ReplyDeleteYou "resent" his critque of other reviews? What, did you write them? I think the criticism of the other reviews helps highlight some of the key issues of the show. Plus, it makes a good point.
ReplyDeleteотличный сайт!
ReplyDelete